missing definition of __STRING macro in standard cygwin headers

[Pedro Alves]

Brian Dessent wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> It wouldn't work.
>> #define __STRING #x != #define __STRING(x) #x
> 
> I am just quoting what the OP said, which was:
> 
>> What the web link basically says that cygwin doesn't have 
>> #define __STRING #x
>> defined in any of the standard header files which means some source code
> 
> I have no idea what this code actually does with the define, having
> never looked at it.
> 

Ah, sorry.  I had seen it in the link the OP posted, and didn't
realize he had posted it wrong.

Cheers,
Pedro Alves



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/