ABI unification

[Francis Litterio]

Dave Korn wrote:

>> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port?
>
>   The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense.  You
> need to do a bit more homework.  I suggest you start by reading the first
> sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/.

Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor?
Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform.
--
Fran


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/