Why are cygwin files (exe. dlls etc. ) not version stamped on Windows?

Václav Haisman v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz
Sat May 17 12:15:00 GMT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

qa4ever@gmail.com wrote, On 14.5.2008 11:50:
| Why are cygwin files (exe. dlls etc. ) not version stamped on Windows?
Because that would involve adding Windows resources to the files which is not
something that source code targetted for *nix usually does. It would involve
patching the source which is what maintainers are usually trying to avoid if
possible.

There are also --{major,minor}-image-version flags for ld but I am not sure
these are the right thing for that (though I have used them to mark Boost
.dlls as 1.33).

- --
VH
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkguy8AACgkQoUFWwtEPkHJVnQCdHfBIFXaRKogtNF+DMB5NNAdF
42MAn3C3f+zDthDXJXKWHVIVvjb71RoH
=ohb3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list