fork performance

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Reinhard Nissl on 5/18/2008 10:47 PM:
| running the following command sequence in bash yields little numbers
| compared to a real unix system:
|
| Is there a chance to speedup performance?

Only if you know how to improve Windows itself to allow fork() semantics
natively instead of emulated.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgxa2IACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDWSACgtb0/pARC5K1ivaBHqFqSvxjZ
TwYAoKnT852XAl6Qkduzg3eDN8p7Ucvj
=jgjY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/