find assert

Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Sun Jan 11 16:31:00 GMT 2009


On Jan 11 07:47, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 1/11/2009 2:16 AM:
> > Are you proposing that Cygwin should change setting errno from ENOSHARE
> > to ENOENT?  ENOSHARE is only set in one single instance and is only
> > explicitly requested in another.  AFAICS, dropping ENOSHARE entirely
> > would only simplify the code and should have no negative consequences
> > (knock on wood here).
> 
> Changing from ENOSHARE to ENOENT would certainly be more POSIX-compliant -
> the error is conveying the information that a path does not exist.  Also,
> if you put some historical context on the problem, ENOSHARE predates the
> implementation of the // namespace.  Back when //server did not represent
> a valid path name, it made sense to have a different error for
> //nosuch/share seeing as how //nosuch could never resolve on its own.  But
> now that //nosuch can potentially resolve, it makes sense to treat it like
> any other path name that can potentially resolve, by returning ENOENT.

That makes sense.  I changed ENOSHARE to ENOENT throughout.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list