To boost maintainer

[Christopher Faylor]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:28PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote:
>No, you  have not done adequate testing obviously.

And you have not adequately understood how to use email.  Starting a new
accusatory thread, expecting people to remember you and your important
assertions, without any references to past discussions makes you seem
rather clueless.

>Also, why is it so difficult to accept that there may be something
>wrong with gcc-4 in cygwin? Somebody wrote a patch that has only
>limited applicability, and guess what it does have limited
>applicability.

Because, given the hostility and arrogance of your email, it is very
easy to dismiss your opinions.

>PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list

And, then there's this, too.

You desperately need to read:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple