[ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated [security]: bash-3.2.49-23 and Windows 7 RC
Edward Lam
edward@sidefx.com
Fri Jul 3 13:44:00 GMT 2009
Eric Blake wrote:
> 61020293 looks like an address in the dll range, probably cygwin1.dll. It
> would be nice to know what function is dying, but doing that may require
> rebuilding a bash image with debugging symbols. Did you by chance do any
> rebasing? Maybe this is a case where I didn't use the correct gcc-4 flags
> for compilation, at which point an updated binutils/gcc might fix things.
No, I didn't do any rebasing. I also tried using rebaseall and
peflagsall to no avail.
Incidentally, is installing the bash and libreadline source broken? If I
install the src for say, the make package, it installs it into a
subdirectory under /usr/src. But when I tried to do the same for
bash-3.2.49-23, I just got a bash src tar ball along with a bunch of
patch files. Is this expected?
-Edward
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list