dash vs. ash?

Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Fri Jul 10 14:33:00 GMT 2009


On Jul 10 05:39, Eric Blake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> According to Corinna Vinschen on 7/10/2009 2:41 AM:
> > I think dash is preferred in future.  In theory we should dash hardlink
> > to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely.  It's about time.  Eric?
> 
> It would work for me.  I can whip out dash-0.5.5.1-2 to provide the ash
> hardlink; do you want me to also do the work of providing the empty ash
> package in the _obsolete category, or do you still want to do that as ash
> maintainer (along with coordinating the two uploads)?

You know, deep in my heart I'm a slacker.  Consequentially I'd be happy
to let you do all the work if you want to do it ;)


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



More information about the Cygwin mailing list