[1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem

Dave Korn dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com
Tue Mar 3 05:46:00 GMT 2009


Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:00:28AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:00:30PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> --pe-dll-characteristics=<name>|<integer>[(+|,:)<name>|<integer>[...]]
>>> I thought we'd established that these aren't just dll characteristics.
>> Well, it's the name of the field in the PE IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER (coff
>> extension header), so it's canonical, regardless if it also applies to
>> executables.
> 
> Yes, I am aware of this.
> 
> Regardless, I don't think a publicly-exposed interface should be unclear
> like this.

  We can discuss this in depth on the binutils list when I submit the patch,
there's not much point in having a long OT thread here.  Let's see what the
other PE stakeholders feel.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list