Wed Mar 18 12:29:00 GMT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
According to Yaakov (Cygwin/X) on 3/17/2009 10:52 PM:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Ah, thanks for pointing this out. (The packages are of course broken as far
>> as portability is concerned, as upstream GCC does not anywhere provide a 'cc'
>> executable; it's presence in the gcc-3 package is caused by the build script
>> creating a symlink as a convenience, so it's wrong in general to assume that
>> there "must be" an executable called 'cc' in the PATH.) I'll add it back into
>> the next release.
> Actually, SUSv2 requires a cc and c89; SUSv3 mentions only a c99.
So it would be nice to have all three names. And perhaps c89 (but not the
others) should imply --std=gnu89.
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake email@example.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin