gcc4: cc

[Dave Korn]

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:

> AFAIK there is no reason for a cc *script*

  Good point!

> As for c89/c99, +1 on the script idea; separate versions are definitely
> not necessary.  Are there supposed to be similar names for the ISO C++
> standards (c++98 and c++0x)?

  Would be trivial to add on top :)

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/