Why do 'find' and 'ls' act differently on ACLs
aputerguy
nabble@kosowsky.org
Sun Nov 8 03:55:00 GMT 2009
As a newbie to Windoze/ACL security, I am probably missing something.
But...
Why do 'ls and 'find' seem to treat the ACL restrictions differently.
Specifically, 'ls /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' works
while 'find /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' returns:
find: `/c/Documents and Settings/Administrator/': Permission denied
I would have thought that 'ls' and 'find' would be bound by the same ACL
restrictions.
Am I missing something basic here in my understanding?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Why-do-%27find%27-and-%27ls%27-act-differently-on-ACLs-tp26250118p26250118.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list