[RFU 1.5 and 1.7] subversion-1.6.5-1 and -2
Thomas Plank
tplank@gmx.at
Wed Sep 9 17:33:00 GMT 2009
David Rothenberger (daveroth@acm.org) wrote:
[subversion]
>> For me it seems that you have compiled it on your own.
>> Did it work for you out of the box?
> I apply about 13 patches to the upstream sources to create the package
> for Cygwin.
Horrible! What a pitty, 1.5.6 worked without any patches ...
> My first hint is to use the binary packages I provide for Cygwin instead
> of compiling it yourself.
Done.
Thanks for providing!
> If you want to
> compile it yourself, I suggest downloading the source package I provide
> and following the directions in
> /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/subversion*.README. The source package also has
> all the patches I apply if you're only interested in that.
I don't feel like doing that work for now.
By the way: is it Cygwins's fault or have they (subversion's programmers)
changed so much in relation to socket.h (?winsock2.h?)?
Thanks for the reply,
Thomas
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list