64-bit time_t?

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is the transition to 1.7 a good time to change the ABI and offer a 64-bit
time_t type that won't overflow in 2038?  Would we have to do the same
sort of transition magic as was done back in 1.5 for 32-bit vs. 64-bit off_t?

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9@byu.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqyHMsACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDWGwCfeNEhefLmrz9u+0A135ZLbLzO
LacAn3BUdTXa8I8RwxHCSZKyK1JQweCS
=QhZR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple