[ANNOUNCEMENT] Update on status of make-3.82 release for cygwin
Wed Aug 11 06:33:00 GMT 2010
On 8/10/2010 10:38 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:04:47PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote:
>> On 8/10/2010 1:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:13:41PM -0700, Rob Walker wrote:
>>>> On Cygwin, make-3.82 supports DOS paths by default. I'm curious about
>>>> what work might be involved in re-enabling the --ms-dos option, and I'd
>>>> like to help, if I can.
>>>> I built my Cygwin make-3.82 packages directly from the upstream release
>>>> tarball using the attached script.
>>> I don't need help. I've been building make for years so I obviously
>>> don't need your script.
>> Sorry for the confusion: I was not offering my script as "hey look,
>> here's how you do it", I was more saying "I did it this way, but maybe
>> that's too simple. What else is involved, and can I help with that?"
> Once again: Don't need help.
> If you are thinking about maintaining a cygwin package then watch what
> is being discussed in cygwin-apps
I am thinking about maintaining a Cygwin package. I have re-subscribed
to cygwin-apps to try to get de-noobed.
> and read the "Cygwin Packages" link on
> the Cygwin web site.
I've read that page pretty closely. The result was my construction and
offer of make-3.81-4 Cygwin packages to address the lack of support for
colons in paths, and later, make-3.82 Cygwin packages.
> If you have a general question about cygwin
> packages then ask it.
My general question was: "What requirements does a package maintainer
need to consider, what tests must pass, etc. when constructing a Cygwin
package from an upstream release?" The answer (which I am paraphrasing
from Larry Hall's response on the matter) seems to be basically:
"Whatever the package maintainer thinks is right."
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin