ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies

Christopher Faylor
Wed Aug 18 20:42:00 GMT 2010

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:32:50PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
>On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
>>>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the
>>>ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process
>>>for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more
>>>relevant set of people.
>>Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package.
>Ahhhh I see.  It's /defined/ to be mediocre.

For *you*, since you've decided to be insulting, you can actually expect
less-than-mediocre handling of your problems, this being a volunteer
process and human nature being what it is and all.


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list