Cygwin paths in mingw64

Christopher Faylor
Fri Nov 5 14:19:00 GMT 2010

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:31:15PM +0000, NightStrike wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Marco Atzeri <> wrote:
>> and Atlas is so deep unix related, that is better to use
>Does this imply that a direct mingw port is not feasible without
>extensive effort?

Can we terminate this discussion now?  It hasn't really been on-topic
for some time and speculation about whether a mingw port is feasible is
really not fodder for this mailing list.


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list