ocaml: patches needed

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Wed Oct 13 15:15:00 GMT 2010

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package.  What I will do instead is:
> ocaml-base   for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocaml        an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-camlp4
> I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or
> ocaml-core.  Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such
> cases?

No, but Debian uses ocaml-base, so I'd suggest that.


Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

More information about the Cygwin mailing list