ocaml: patches needed
Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Wed Oct 13 15:15:00 GMT 2010
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:47 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't
> implement the full upstream package. What I will do instead is:
>
> ocaml-base for the system except camlp4
> ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4
> ocaml an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-camlp4
>
> I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or
> ocaml-core. Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such
> cases?
No, but Debian uses ocaml-base, so I'd suggest that.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list