We have a "cygstart" -- why not a "cygstop"?

[SJ Wright]

Or does such an idea go too much against the grain of "let's keep Cygwin 
as much of a Unix as possible?"

At the very least, it would cut through all the rigamorole of "kill"-ing 
pids that were likely to return errors.

Comments?

SJ Wright

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple