ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

[Erwin Waterlander]

Op 18-3-2011 7:53, Charles Wilson schreef:
> On 3/17/2011 4:36 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> OK, everybody, time out for a minute.  Rather than talk vapor, I'll
>> develop the patches necessary.
> Fair warning: I've developed this patch set, and made a cygport-based
> package...but I have NOT TESTED the apps at all.  More later, but it's
> way past my bed time...
>
>> The first one, or first set (e.g. #2, above), I'll propose that
>> "official" upstream dos2unix accept *for all platforms*.  It will not
>> change upstream's behavior in any way, except for offering some new options.
> 01-avoid-hardlink-exist-error.patch
> 02-cygwin-defines-win32-but-isnt.patch
> 03-add--safe-option.patch
> 04-add-follow-no-follow--infile-only.patch
> 05-rationalize-logic-flow.patch
> 06-add-ResolveSymbolicLink-function.patch
> 07-support-follow-no-follow--outfile.patch
> 08-use-canonicalize-file-name-glibc24-cygwin17.patch
>
> === 01-avoid-hardlink-exist-error.patch
>   Makefile |    2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> === 02-cygwin-defines-win32-but-isnt.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   10 +++++-----
>   unix2dos.c |   10 +++++-----
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> === 03-add--safe-option.patch
>   dos2unix.c |    3 +++
>   unix2dos.c |    3 +++
>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> === 04-add-follow-no-follow--infile-only.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   unix2dos.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> === 05-rationalize-logic-flow.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>   unix2dos.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>   2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> === 06-add-ResolveSymbolicLink-function.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   unix2dos.c |   94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 188 insertions(+)
>
> === 07-support-follow-no-follow--outfile.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   unix2dos.c |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> === 08-use-canonicalize-file-name-glibc24-cygwin17.patch
>   dos2unix.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>   unix2dos.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> Assuming they work (natch) I think these are suitable for upstream.
>
>> The second one (#1, above), I'll propose that Erwin use as part of his
>> initial cygwin package offering.  This one would be only a transitional
>> measure, and would be slated to be dropped from a later cygwin package
>> after a certain amount of time has passed.
> === dos2unix-5.2.1-1.src.patch
>   dos2unix.c |    2 +-
>   unix2dos.c |    2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Obviously, this one would eventually disappear, and would never go
> "upstream".
>
>
> Then, of course, there's the purely packaging related patch:
>
> === dos2unix-5.2.1-1.cygwin.patch
>   dos2unix.README |   95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   setup.hint      |    7 ++++
>   2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
>
>> With regards to the d2u/u2d aliases, for now I'd just modify the cygport
>> script to create those as hardlinks, and not modify or patch the package
>> source at all.
> cygport script handles this.  So...
>
> http://cygwin.cwilson.fastmail.fm/dos2unix-5.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://cygwin.cwilson.fastmail.fm/dos2unix-5.2.1-1.tar.bz2
>
> ...but be warned...ZERO testing so far.
>

Hi Chuck,

Thank you very much for your hard work!
I will have a look at it and do some testing.

Erwin

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple