Using Red Hat digital signing on setup.exe (was Re: Cygwin 1.7.14-2 setup.exe v2.772 broken?)

Christopher Faylor
Sat Apr 28 20:50:00 GMT 2012

It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:22:29PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
>Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the
>installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?

setup.exe is not produced by Red Hat and the Cygwin project at is not a Red Hat project.  So, the logicstics of doing this
aside, I doubt that Red Hat would be too keen on the idea.


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list