more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20)

[marco atzeri]

On 2/23/2012 3:35 PM, Tassilo Philipp wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Tassilo Philipp  wrote:
>>> Doesn't do anything, and believe me, I tried that probably 50 times in
>>> all kinds of combinations...
>>
>> do not top post please.
>
> ? I just hit reply... so I don't know what you mean? Sorry if I did
> something weird.
>

see:
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost

>
>>  From where this "etc.so" is coming for ?
>
> I guess ruby. I'll check exactly where it's from...
> However, I tried to rebase it as you described below, and still face the
> same problem.
> I'll check if I face the BLODA problem as Corinna pointed out.
>
> Thank you for your help, so far!

etc.so is a dll coming from ruby.
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=etc.so

Could you try to explain us what exactly are you running/doing
when you catch the error ?
I doubt you are simply running a ruby program.

As "etc.so" belongs to ruby package, rebaseall should have
already rebased "etc.so" to another address than 0x360000

what is the outcome of
    rebase -s -i |grep etc.so

Regards
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple