rebase keeps last modification time of DLL unchanged
Robert Miles
robertmiles@bellsouth.net
Sat Mar 10 21:42:00 GMT 2012
On 3/9/2012 1:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 9 19:22, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Mar 8 21:37, Christian Franke wrote:
> I'm not so sure this option would make a lot of sense. An option not
> used by rebaseall by default won't be used anyway. We should decide
> which behaviour makes more sense and then just do it.
>
> Actually, the aforementioned backup scenario implies to me that setting
> the timestamp makes more sense. Restoring a broken Cygwin installation
> from a backup and then immediately getting rebase problems again, just
> because an incremental backup didn't catch the rebased DLLs sounds pretty
> frustrating. OTOH, who's doing incremental backup these days?
>
> Corinna
>
I am. I don't feel like buying a new hard drive or a new disk server
every month
or so in order to preserve all my backups as long as I often need them -
some
problems simply aren't obvious for a few months.
Robert Miles
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list