Missing values in w32api enum

[Charles Wilson]

The following are missing from the definition of enum 
WELL_KNOWN_SID_TYPE in winnt.h:

   WinBuiltinDCOMUsersSid                       = 61,
   WinBuiltinIUsersSid                          = 62,
   WinIUserSid                                  = 63,
   WinBuiltinCryptoOperatorsSid                 = 64,
   WinUntrustedLabelSid                         = 65,
   WinLowLabelSid                               = 66,
   WinMediumLabelSid                            = 67,
   WinHighLabelSid                              = 68,
   WinSystemLabelSid                            = 69,
   WinWriteRestrictedCodeSid                    = 70,
   WinCreatorOwnerRightsSid                     = 71,
   WinCacheablePrincipalsGroupSid               = 72,
   WinNonCacheablePrincipalsGroupSid            = 73,
   WinEnterpriseReadonlyControllersSid          = 74,
   WinAccountReadonlyControllersSid             = 75,
   WinBuiltinEventLogReadersGroup               = 76,
   WinNewEnterpriseReadonlyControllersSid       = 77,
   WinBuiltinCertSvcDComAccessGroup             = 78,
   WinMediumPlusLabelSid                        = 79,
   WinLocalLogonSid                             = 80,
   WinConsoleLogonSid                           = 81,
   WinThisOrganizationCertificateSid            = 82,
   WinApplicationPackageAuthoritySid            = 83,
   WinBuiltinAnyPackageSid                      = 84,
   WinCapabilityInternetClientSid               = 85,
   WinCapabilityInternetClientServerSid         = 86,
   WinCapabilityPrivateNetworkClientServerSid   = 87,
   WinCapabilityPicturesLibrarySid              = 88,
   WinCapabilityVideosLibrarySid                = 89,
   WinCapabilityMusicLibrarySid                 = 90,
   WinCapabilityDocumentsLibrarySid             = 91,
   WinCapabilitySharedUserCertificatesSid       = 92,
   WinCapabilityEnterpriseAuthenticationSid     = 93,
   WinCapabilityRemovableStorageSid             = 94

(See 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa379650(v=vs.85).aspx 
)

Should I send this as a patch to mingw64.sf (are they the maintainers of 
our w32api now?)

--
Chuck

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple