sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test
Warren Young
warren@etr-usa.com
Mon Feb 11 20:14:00 GMT 2013
On 2/6/2013 15:44, David Stacey wrote:
> I've run four sets of tests, with sqlite3 3.7.13 and
> 3.7.15, both with and without Warren's patch. The bottom line is that
> Subversion appears to function identically in all four cases, and there
> was no significant difference in runtime performance (i.e. the time
> taken to run the tests).
I'm inferring from "four tests" that this result is for the fsfs case
only, and that bdb is still assumed to have a problem.
Since this report of yours on Jan 9, I've been meaning to try and set up
the famous SQLite test suite on a Cygwin box and set it to grinding, to
exonerate the new .15.1 builds. But if we think it now doesn't matter...
> I can supply more details if you need them, but essentially Subversion
> appears to function happily with sqlite3 3.7.13 or 3.7.15, both with or
> without the patch.
.15.2 is out, so do you want me to build a new set of packages for you
to test and potentially GTG?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list