gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Tue Nov 5 02:18:00 GMT 2013


On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
> aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
> and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate.  'Course, my
> to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users
> with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup
> doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism).
>
> The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and
> sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin.
>
> If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what?
>
> Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers?  Use $libexecdir but
> "know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately?  I'm
> confused as to how to proceed here.

Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with 
--libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



More information about the Cygwin mailing list