gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails
Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
yselkowitz@users.sourceforge.net
Tue Nov 5 02:18:00 GMT 2013
On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
> aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
> and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate. 'Course, my
> to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users
> with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup
> doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism).
>
> The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and
> sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin.
>
> If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what?
>
> Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers? Use $libexecdir but
> "know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately? I'm
> confused as to how to proceed here.
Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with
--libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense.
Yaakov
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list