siginfo_t missing member si_band

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Oct 16 15:17, Bengt Larsson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> >I guess so.  In a project that wasn't requestware or wishware it would
> >be a spur for someone to submit code to Cygwin to implement SIGPOLL and
> >it's accompanying siginfo_t handling.  Unfortunately, Cygwin seems to
> >be mainly requestware these days.
> 
> Is a bug report "requestware"? I actually did look at the malloc code
> but I found it very hard to understand.

No, good bugreports with testcases are usually a joy (unless it's in a
part of code the developer hates a lot, but that goes without saying, I
guess).  As for the Doug Lea malloc code, I think there aren't so many
people claiming they fully understand the code.  Except Doug Lea,
probably.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20131016/269335ec/attachment.sig>