Trouble with running cygwin dll on Vortex86MX+ CPU

[Peter A. Castro]

On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:

> On 4/7/2014 9:50 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:28:29PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> 2) Packaging changes of setup.exe have made extracting the version string
>>>>      impossible, save for actually running setup, which isn't something 
>>>> I'm
>>>>      going to do on a daily basis.  If there is a method of extracting 
>>>> this
>>>>      info from it, please do tell me how.
>>> 
>>> I'm assuming it used to just be in the RC file in the past.  Didn't look
>>> in the history to trace it back.  But now it is generated and put in
>>> setup_version.c as a global constant setup_version.
>> 
>> setup.exe is packed with upx.  If you want to see the version string I
>> suppose you could unpack it with upx.
>
> Of course!  Why didn't I think of that?
>
> strings setup*.exe | grep setup-version
>
> This returns the version for a _decompressed_ setup executable.

This is, in fact, what I was doing before there was a change in the packer 
utility that I was unable to, at the time. build for myself.

I've just built a newer version of upx (and ucl, etc) and now I will start 
archiving setup, x86 & x86_64, (again).  Need to update my webpage 
automation to generate an access list, but atleast I'm grabbing and 
archiving them (again).

Thanks for bringing this (back) to my attention (again).

In general, though, unless and until there is a significant change to 
the setup.ini format, the most recent installer *should* just work.

-- 
--=> Peter A. Castro
Email: doctor at fruitbat dot org / Peter dot Castro at oracle dot com
 	"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple