Newbie Questions
Mike Rushton
mrushton@ptd.net
Wed Feb 5 21:44:00 GMT 2014
Right ... the extension is a windows thing.
Most of the bourne shell scripts i have come across have no extension.
Some have the Shebang line ... while others don't have it.
I am still in the planing stages ... I am not sure if I am going to use
an extension or not.
It might be a good idea to use .sh and then you would know that it is a
script.
On 2/5/2014 4:17 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 2/5/2014 11:30, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 2/5/2014 1:25 PM, Mike Rushton wrote:
>>> does cygwin have a preferred extension for scripts ?
>>
>> No, the extension can be whatever you like. By convention, bash/sh
>> scripts
>> with extensions use ".sh".
>
> I'd bet there are more Bourne shell scripts in the world with no
> extension at all than .sh.
>
> For the most part, Mike, POSIXy systems like Cygwin and Linux use
> magic bytes[1] and the shebang line[2] to figure out what is contained
> in a given file, rather than the file name.
>
>
> [1] http://goo.gl/5F9P33
> [2] http://goo.gl/XjINSi
>
>
> --
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list