Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field?
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Thu Feb 27 12:55:00 GMT 2014
On Feb 27 08:09, Dirk Fassbender wrote:
> Am 27.02.2014 01:45, schrieb Jim Burwell:
> >On 2/26/2014 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>The common case would be for a shell to show up in /etc/shells. Under
> >>>Fedora adds the shell to /etc/shells when the shell package is
> >>>installed. I don't see any reason for us to do anything different.
> >>Rephrasing that in English:
> >>
> >>Under Fedora, shells add themselves to /etc/shells file when they are
> >>installed.
> >>
> >>cgf
> >>
> >>--
> >>Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> >>
> >Yep. At least for common shells. If someone is super security
> >conscious, they can police their /etc/shells file. But the most common
> >usage would be to simply allow a shell that's installed, since if a
> >person installed a shell, you can safely presume they want to use it.
> >
> >--
> >Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> One remark about /etc/shells
> The inetutils and inetutils-server packages comes with a file
> /etc/defaults/etc/shells
> and the postinstall scripts installs these file into /etc/shells.
Good hint. That's where I remember /etc/shells from.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20140227/6bb9e1ab/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list