Severe performance degradation of writev
David Rothenberger
daveroth@acm.org
Wed Jul 9 16:46:00 GMT 2014
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 7 12:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 7 07:28, jojelino wrote:
>>> 2008-07-27 Corinna Vinschen <corinna@vinschen.de>
>>>
>>> * fhandler_socket.cc (fhandler_socket::send_internal): Send
>>> never more then 64K bytes at once. For blocking sockets, loop
>>> until entire data has been sent or an error occurs.
>>> (fhandler_socket::sendto): Drop code which sends on 64K bytes.
>>> (fhandler_socket::sendmsg): Ditto.
>>>
>>> This commit added workaround for KB823764. but it has brought
>>> another performance issue when writev sends <64k of data.
>>
>> That's why the code contains that FIXME comment. If you have a
>> good idea for simple code to split a message into the least
>> number of pieces to minimize the number of WsaSendTo calls...
>
> I took a stab at the code and I think the new version improves
> writing multiple small buffers a lot. In my testing it still works
> in other scenarios, too, but I would be very grateful if somebody
> could have a critical look into my code changes as posted in
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2014-q3/msg00003.html
>
> I uploaded a new developer snapshot to
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please give it a thorough try.
FWIW, this snapshot fixed a recent performance degradation for me when
doing ssh/rsync transfers within my local network at work. These
transfers had run at about 25 MB/s but recently degraded to about 500
kB/s. The snapshot restored the original performance.
--
David Rothenberger ---- daveroth@acm.org
Issawi's Laws of Progress:
The Course of Progress:
Most things get steadily worse.
The Path of Progress:
A shortcut is the longest distance between two points.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list