Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Tue Mar 4 11:35:00 GMT 2014


On Mar  4 00:44, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
> 
> >> I'd need to test it in domain environment,
> 
> And with sane number of groups (less than 20), the results are barely
> different between different caching strategies (less than 1%, which could
> easily be explained by measurement error), except (again) for the case of
> runing `id' under "db_cache: no", which takes approximately twice as long, as
> any other way. 
> 
> If you ask me, the choice is between "db_cahce: yes" and "db_cache: full", and
> I don't have solid reason to prefer one over another. Not running with remote
> connection to the domain here...

Ok, thanks.  I guess I'll remove the "db_cache: no" option at one
point.  It just doesn't seem to make sense.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20140304/32497d32/attachment.sig>


More information about the Cygwin mailing list