Packages up for adoption

[Yaakov Selkowitz]

On 2014-09-19 09:56, Warren Young wrote:
> 3. Other than time, is there a reason you haven't released R50b yet?  It
> seems to pass its own test suite here, so if I adopt it, I'm committing
> to releasing R50b shortly, unless there are traps I haven't discovered.

I suspect it was just a matter of time (or lack thereof).

> 4. What do you think about replacing mksh in Cygwin with ksh93?  It
> seems OSS-enough to make Red Hat happy. [2]

We could ship both and just not have a ksh -> mksh symlink.  But if you 
do decide to build ksh93, then please be sure to add the Fedora 
patchset, as there are a lot of fixes there.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple