More details about the tmux 2.0 regression
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Wed Jun 10 08:27:00 GMT 2015
On Jun 9 14:23, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> Achim Gratz
> Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 +0000 (UTC)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> > Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough
> > for Linux anyway.
> > :-)
>
> Would be great if the ps from procps would work as the current ps,
> e.g. ps -W (with and without windows-processes - is this possible
> now?), and no slowdown.
-W is not possible with procps, unless somebody implements it. We can't
just copy over the code from Cygwin's ps for licensing reasons either.
But, here's the deal: Nothing at all speaks against improving Cygwin's
ps to put it on a better footing with procps.
It's rather old code(*), but pretty simple and not much of it (less than
400 lines). It should be fairly easy to add functionality to make it a
better ps. A clear case of https://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PGA
Corinna
(*) There are still Windows 2000 considerations in the code. Yuk!
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20150610/33c5d4b1/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list