gem broken ?

[cyg Simple]

On 6/27/2016 11:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> Hmm, I'm undecided if this should be fixed in ruby or if we need a
> Cygwin 2.5.3 reverting this patch...
> 

In my opinion the patch should remain; a library doesn't have to be
named with extension .dll.  That is just the default.  It could just as
easily be named with .so as the extension.

-- 
cyg Simple

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple