gem broken ?
cyg Simple
cygsimple@gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 14:10:00 GMT 2016
On 6/27/2016 11:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Hmm, I'm undecided if this should be fixed in ruby or if we need a
> Cygwin 2.5.3 reverting this patch...
>
In my opinion the patch should remain; a library doesn't have to be
named with extension .dll. That is just the default. It could just as
easily be named with .so as the extension.
--
cyg Simple
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list