Id3tag and lame packages?
Fri Sep 23 20:50:00 GMT 2016
On 9/22/16, 3:35 PM, David Stacey wrote:
>On 22/09/16 22:58, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
>> BTW, you mentioned a legal problem. I am seeing that LAME is LGPL
>> and therefore should be eligible for inclusion in Cygwin(?).
>No, there are plenty of LGPL packages in Cygwin. The problem with LAME
>is that it still has a number of active patents.  is a good write-up
>describing the problem, and said patents are enumerated in .
> - https://lwn.net/Articles/178285/
> - http://mp3licensing.com/patents/index.html
Thank you, David. My apologies for the late response, my junk filters have
a mind of their own.
More information about the Cygwin