util-linux: getopt: broken --name option for a while now
Andrey Repin
anrdaemon@yandex.ru
Fri Dec 7 17:35:00 GMT 2018
Greetings, Houder!
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 02:56:50, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, All!
>>
>> This has been plaguing me for several years, but only now I got to test it
>> more thoroughly.
>> Shame on me.
>>
>> $ /usr/bin/getopt --options '+H' --shell sh --name x -- -d
>> getopt: unknown option -- d
>>
>> Expected output:
>> x: unknown option -- d
>>
>> $ /usr/bin/getopt -V
>> getopt from util-linux 2.25.2
>>
>> Poked around,
>> getopt from 2.20.1, 2.27.1, 2.31.1 and (reportedly)2.33 works as expected.
> 2.27.1? Typo?
No, just a different OS.
# lsb_release -a; /usr/bin/getopt -V; /usr/bin/getopt --options '+H' --shell sh --name x -- -d
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Release: 16.04
Codename: xenial
getopt from util-linux 2.27.1
x: invalid option -- 'd'
--
> See:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43078330/how-to-use-the-name-argument-to-getopt
> ( How to use the --name argument to getopt? )
> "This is a bug (or just a non-portability issue) which is already fixed in
> util-linux 2.28, by commit 30fbf2f6. Before this fix it worked only on Linux,
That explains it.
> OSX and a few BSD flavors but not on WIN32 or GNU-Hurd for example".
> The answer by "rudimeier" also decribes a temporary work-around.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Friday, December 7, 2018 20:24:07
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list