Regression (last snapshot)

Ken Brown kbrown@cornell.edu
Sat Jul 27 00:14:00 GMT 2019


On 7/26/2019 6:12 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 7/22/2019 2:47 PM, Houder wrote:
>> The specific regression as reported, has gone.
>>
>> 64-@@ uname -a
>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Seven 3.1.0s(0.339/5/3) 2019-07-22 16:43 x86_64 Cygwin
>> 64-@@ ls -lL <(grep bash .bashrc)
>> pr-------- 1 Henri None 0 Jul 22 20:36 /dev/fd/63
> 
> It turns out that this isn't completely fixed, but I only see the problem when
> working under X11, and the error message is different.  Here are the complete
> reproduction steps:
> 
> 1. Start the X server by using the XWin Server shortcut.
> 
> 2. Use the X Applications Menu -> System Tools to start an xterm window.
> 
> 3. In that window, execute the above 'ls' command.:
> 
> $ ls -lL <(grep bash .bashrc)
> pr-------- 1 kbrown None 0 2019-07-26 17:24 /dev/fd/63
> grep: write error: Broken pipe
> 
> This is with the 2019-07-22 snapshot.  With the 2019-07-25 snapshot, it's better
> but still broken: I have to run the ls command twice to get the error:
> 
> $ ls -lL <(grep bash .bashrc)
> pr-------- 1 kbrown None 0 2019-07-26 17:39 /dev/fd/63
> 
> $ ls -lL <(grep bash .bashrc)
> pr-------- 1 kbrown None 0 2019-07-26 17:39 /dev/fd/63
> grep: write error: Broken pipe
> 
> Here's one more fact, which may or not provide further clues: When I exited the
> X server while testing the 2019-07-22 snapshot, there was a /bin/sh process
> still running that I couldn't kill with 'kill -9'.  I had to kill it with the
> Task Manager.
> 
> Finally, here's an excerpt from the strace output for the failing ls command:
> 
>      24   23441 [main] ls 1033 fhandler_proc::get_proc_fhandler:
> get_proc_fhandler(/proc/1033/fd/63)
>      25   23466 [main] ls 1033 mount_info::conv_to_win32_path: src_path
> /proc/1033/fd/63, dst /proc/1033/fd/63, flags 0x0, rc 0
>      28   23494 [main] ls 1033 build_fh_pc: fh 0x180340098, dev 000000FB
>      24   23518 [main] ls 1033 fhandler_process::exists: exists (/proc/1033/fd/63)
>      28   23546 [main] ls 1033 __set_errno: cygheap_fdget::cygheap_fdget(int,
> bool, bool):679 setting errno 9
>      24   23570 [main] ls 1033 __set_errno: off_t format_process_fd(void*,
> char*&):394 setting errno 2
> 
> I'm in the process of building an unoptimized cygwin1.dll to see if I can get
> further information.

I just discovered that this problem already existed in commit f0ea836b7, which 
preceded the commit that led to the problem Houder reported.  So this must be 
something different.  I'll do a new bisection for the current problem.

Ken
B‹KCB”›Ø›[H™\ܝΈ‹ËØÞYÝÚ[‹˜ÛÛKܛ؛[\Ëš[B‘TNˆ‹ËØÞYÝÚ[‹˜ÛÛKÙ˜\KÃB‘ØÝ[Y[][ÛŽˆ‹ËØÞYÝÚ[‹˜ÛÛKÙØÜËš[B•[œÝXœØÜšX™H[™›Îˆ‹ËØÞYÝÚ[‹˜ÛÛKÛ[ÈÝ[œÝXœØÜšX™K\Ú[\CBƒB


More information about the Cygwin mailing list