Question regarding OpenSSL 1.1.1b package configuration against OpenSSL 1.0.2r

Brian Inglis Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca
Wed Jun 5 06:24:00 GMT 2019


On 2019-06-04 22:26, Houder wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:04:16, Vince Rice  wrote:
>> It's cygport, he doesn't have to know about compiling C. ...
> Vince, this utter nonsense, and you know it!

He hopefully should not, just rebuilding and reconfiguring an existing source
package, with current tools.

C difficulties normally occur after compiler upgrades.
Most cygport issues revolve around autotools, autoconfig, automake, and require
conversations with upstream for joint resolution across systems.

If he has difficulties, he could post here, and we'd help.
Anyway, he appears to have been successful.

RFC IPR section comments "implementations based on these domain parameters may
require use of inventions covered by patent rights. In particular, techniques
for an efficient arithmetic exploiting the special parameters of the twisted
curves may be covered by patents."
Certicom Research published a number of papers on efficient Brainpool ECCs.
The OP may want to run that by his org's legal IP group.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



More information about the Cygwin mailing list