Fwd: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?

Wed Jan 29 16:33:00 GMT 2020

Am 29.01.2020 um 16:39 schrieb Hans-Bernhard BrÃ¶ker:
> [Ooops, sent this to Takashi instead of the list, originally.]
> 
> Am 29.01.2020 um 14:46 schrieb Takashi Yano:
>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:19:11 +0100
>> Marco Atzeri wrote:
> 
>>> As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing
>>> a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing
>>> a latent bug or race.

> Note that fp->_seek64 is actually null, so this is calling a null 
> pointer, possibly caused by gnulib interfering with the call sequence?
> 

or applying the wrong sequence to a Posix system, that portion of Octave
is built using gnulib submodules. It seems the new build are taking the
wrong pieces.

Thank to both for your efforts
Marco

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple