stdin pipe rename in 3.2.0

Brian Inglis
Fri Mar 19 11:30:32 GMT 2021

On 2021-03-19 01:53, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:47 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
>> On 2021-03-18 14:28, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
>> If these are being renamed should they not now use neutral terminology based on
>> terms such as primary and secondary, and the primary/default repo branches on a
>> term such as main?

> Yes. Though there are ~700 instances of such terms in the cygwin code
> so I'd suggest you propose this separately to the list.

I'm not suggesting anyone even attempt to do a mass clean up of such terms.

But as any area needs work where these terms are used, take the opportunity.

Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

More information about the Cygwin mailing list