posix_spawn facility
Bruno Haible
bruno@clisp.org
Tue Apr 18 22:10:34 GMT 2023
Eric Blake wrote:
> we now have implementations in the wild that differ in behavior, and
> use security as a reason for the divergence, it is worth getting that
> clarified in POSIX. I'll file a bug against POSIX shortly
For the reference, the systems that return ENOEXEC for posix_spawnp
attempting to execute a script without #! marker are:
- glibc/Linux ≥ 2.15
- glibc/Hurd ≥ 2.33 (commit 13adfa34aff03fd9f1c1612b537a0d736ddb6c2b)
- musl libc
Bruno
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list