Running setup-x86_64.exe from cmd does nothing but works from cygwin itself
Jon Turney
jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk
Tue Feb 13 16:06:55 GMT 2024
On 12/02/2024 21:37, matthew patton via Cygwin wrote:
>> If you really suspect some AV problems, it may help to try the>
>> uncompressed setup executable, available from [1]
> Huh, when did this start? Nobody pays by BW anymore so what was the
Firstly, do not send me personal email.
I think we started providing setup as a UPX compressed executable in
2002 or 2003. In any case, long before my involvement.
Certainly there's an argument for *not* doing it these days, although
your assertion that "nobody pays for BW" seems likely to be based on
your personal perspective, rather than a survey of Cygwin users globally.
I've recently started providing the uncompressed executable *in addition
to* the compressed one (because people occasionally have problems where
their AV won't let them run *any* UPX compressed program).
> rationale behind a "self altering" executable? No wonder it would
> experience havoc in an A/V environment since the extracted temp file
> may well be located on a non-executable location and or EXEC would
> have been shimmed by AV and it doesn't correctly return control from
> an ephemeral location.
You're making assumptions here about how the decompression stub works,
which I don't think are accurate for UPX.
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list