Hangs in cygwin 3.5.5-1: should 3.5.5-1 be rolled back?
Takashi Yano
takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp
Fri Jan 24 22:17:03 GMT 2025
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:55:18 +0100
Michael Soegtrop wrote:
> Dear Cygwin Team,
>
> I just wanted to confirm that I haven't seen issues with recent test
> releases. But the test versions change to fast to say conclusively that
> each of the versions are OK.
>
> The last version for which I did see failures was:
>
> 3.6.0-0.321.g23f4aac7e760 (2 failures in 10 runs)
>
> This version was stable for a few days but then started to fail -
> possibly some other package changed but it could also be random. If this
> is of interest, I can research this or send you pointers to the package
> lists in the logs. If it is random, the statistics gathered so far on
> later releases are not conclusive.
>
> I had *no* failures with:
>
> 3.6.0-0.327.gca22984cc4ad (4 runs)
>
> 3.6.0-0.336.g2cc4d14f2a02 (2 runs)
>
> 3.6.0-0.338.ge0bc8172712(2 runs)
>
> 3.6.0-0.343.gbf94b87f54de(2 runs)
Thanks for testing!
> If you have a release candidate, I can run more thorough tests, but it
> should be stable then for 2 days.
We have no plan for release candidate, but will release 3.5.6
in a few days.
--
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list