readdir() returns inaccessible name if file was created with invalid UTF-8
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Thu Jul 24 18:38:18 GMT 2025
On Jul 24 19:45, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin wrote:
> Am 24.07.2025 um 17:35 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> > Consider the following GB18030 string: 0x90 0x30 0x81 0x30
> >
> > This string translates into a UTF-16 surrogate pair: 0xd800 0xdc00.
> >
> > If you run a tweaked version of your test applicaton from
> > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2025-July/258513.html:
> >
> > setlocale (LC_CTYPE, "zh_CN.gb18030");
> > mb (0x90);
> > mb (0x30);
> > mb (0x81);
> > mb (0x30);
> >
> > Then the output is:
> >
> > 90 -> 0000 : -2
> > 30 -> 0000 : -2
> > 81 -> 0000 : -2
> > 30 -> D800 : 0
> >
> > However, if you notice this situation...
> >
> > if (ret_from_mbrtowc == 0 && codeset == gb18030
> > && (pwc & 0xfc00) == 0xd800)
> >
> > ...you can just add a fake NUL byte:
> >
> > mbrtowc (&wc, '\0', 1, &mbstate);
> >
> > If you do that, the above sequence becomes:
> >
> > 90 -> 0000 : -2
> > 30 -> 0000 : -2
> > 81 -> 0000 : -2
> > 30 -> D800 : 0
> > 00 -> DC00 : 1
> >
> > I hope this helps, if you didn't already handle GB18030 differently
> > in mintty.
> Oooff. No, I didn't. So that is already before 3.6.4 (and again 3.6.5),
> right?
Starting with 3.5.0 in fact.
> Thanks for the notice, I'll check and test your workaround.
No worries. While I was testing the UTF-8 problem, I realized that
we have another strange encoding we're supporting for a short while.
GB18030 is tricky, because there's no such thing as a simple
mathematical conversion, as it is for UTF-8. The 2nd and 4th bytes may
have position dependent meaning and could just as well represent an
ASCII char. You can't simply search backwards in a string either.
As I wrote, you need all 4 bytes to allow conversion into UTF-16, so
a workaround as above is, unfortunately, necessary.
Corinna
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list