fork error when trying to call VirtualAlloc with size==0

[Yuyi Wang]

On Fri, 23 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> Maybe.  MSYS2 doesn't generally advise to rebase on x86_64, but I think
> Cygwin does as part of its setup/postinstall hooks.  As a hack, I was able
> to work around this by setting the "dynamicbase" flag on the dlls (it's a
> long story about why this helps rather than hurts in this particular case)

I believe it is ASLR right? I thought cygwin doesn't support such DLLs on fork.
If it helps here, should I add this flag for all DLLs & EXEs compiled by Rust?

--
Yuyi Wang