A question for the Ruby maintainer: RubyGems?
Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports)
Thu Jan 19 22:32:00 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Igor Peshansky wrote:
> Heh, that's cool, thanks for saving me the effort, Yaakov.
Well, IIRC, thank Gentoo for that solution.
> Corinna already indicated her willingness to give over maintainership into
> capable hands. I don't use Ruby regularly (just starting to dabble in
> it), so I'm reluctant to make a grab for it. If you feel confident in
> your ability to keep Cygwin Ruby going, would you like to offer to
> maintain it?
Not yet, although I'll try building it from source and see how it goes;
there are a few very minor things I'd like to see changed.
> Also, if there is a maintainership change, and since you've already
> packaged RubyGems (and are presumably willing to maintain it as well), it
> might (IMHO) be a good idea to fold RubyGems into the main Ruby package.
I disagree with this one. The rubygems system isn't (yet) so integral
to ruby like CPAN to perl. It's a separate package upstream with its
own release cycle, so I think it should be a separate package here as well.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Cygwin-apps