[HEADSUP] openssl-1.0.1 vs. openssl 0.9.8

marco atzeri marco.atzeri@gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 13:00:00 GMT 2013

On 2/13/2013 1:43 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
> On 12 February 2013 10:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> since openssl 1.0.1 is our recent version for a while now, I'd like to
>> ask those of you which still have packages linked against libopenssl098
>> to update your packages to new versions linked against libopenssl100.
>> The following packages are affected:
>>    libtorrent11  Chris Sutcliffe
>>    libtorrent14  Chris Sutcliffe
>> There isn't much pressure yet, since I'll continue to support the old
>> libopenssl098 a while, but if it's not asked too much, it would be nice
>> if you could update your packages.
> I've been fighting with the latest stable rtorrent / libtorrent (as
> have many people - FreeBSD, etc.) as it has a tendency to peg CPUs at
> 100%.  As a result the Cygwin release is lagging behind the upstream
> release and is the reason there hasn't been a recent release.  I'm
> more than happy to rebuild the current release (i.e. libtorrent14)
> against the updated libopenssl, question I have is do I also need to
> rebuild the previous release (i.e. libtorrent11), or can we just drop
> it?
> Thanks,
> Chris

as libtorrent11 is required by no current package , drop it.


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list