[HEADSUP] openssl-1.0.1 vs. openssl 0.9.8

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Feb 13 14:00, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 2/13/2013 1:43 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> >Hi Corinna,
> >
> >On 12 February 2013 10:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>since openssl 1.0.1 is our recent version for a while now, I'd like to
> >>ask those of you which still have packages linked against libopenssl098
> >>to update your packages to new versions linked against libopenssl100.
> >>
> >>The following packages are affected:
> >>
> >>   libtorrent11  Chris Sutcliffe
> >>   libtorrent14  Chris Sutcliffe
> >>
> >>There isn't much pressure yet, since I'll continue to support the old
> >>libopenssl098 a while, but if it's not asked too much, it would be nice
> >>if you could update your packages.
> >
> >I've been fighting with the latest stable rtorrent / libtorrent (as
> >have many people - FreeBSD, etc.) as it has a tendency to peg CPUs at
> >100%.  As a result the Cygwin release is lagging behind the upstream
> >release and is the reason there hasn't been a recent release.  I'm
> >more than happy to rebuild the current release (i.e. libtorrent14)
> >against the updated libopenssl, question I have is do I also need to
> >rebuild the previous release (i.e. libtorrent11), or can we just drop
> >it?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Chris
> >
> 
> as libtorrent11 is required by no current package , drop it.

ACK.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat