Sat May 15 13:36:00 GMT 2004
Your sarcastic posts and dry humor on this topic are not accomplishing
anything. Given they could still be taken either way, I'd say you were
not nearly blunt enough.
Please, you speak for yourself, and let Chris speak for himself, if either
of you even choose to do so. Both of you are free to /dev/null me if you
like. I'll get that hint pretty fast.
On Fri, 14 May 2004, GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
> My email was directed solely at Brian and his bothersome posts, patches,
> etc (pfhht, like I have to tell you what a pain the guy is!). I was
> merely trying to get him off your back so you could get to more
> important things. Such unproductive babbling doesn't just bother you,
> you know! Why heck, you should have *seen* the tantrum that I had all
> typed up and ready to send to Brian instead of what I did post! It was
> so juvenile that I was too embarrassed to hit "send"! One hum-dinger I
> tell ya!
> Anywhoo, I sure hope this clears up any confusion, and that this reply
> wasn't too blunt. Or was overly blunt. Or was just blunt enough. Or was
> suffering from blunt-force trauma from the blunt end of a blunted blunt
> Or at the very least didn't have too fine a point on it.
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot...
More information about the Cygwin-developers